翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Prevention of Major Industrial Accidents Convention, 1993
・ Prevention of migraines
・ Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002
・ Prevention of Offences Act 1851
・ Prevention of Organised Crime Act, 1998
・ Prevention of Seditious Meetings Act
・ Prevention of Seditious Meetings Act, 1907
・ Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013
・ Prevention of Tay–Sachs disease
・ Prevention of Terror Ordinance
・ Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989
・ Prevention of Terrorism Act
・ Prevention of Terrorism Act (Sri Lanka)
・ Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005
・ Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015
Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002
・ Prevention of Terrorism Acts
・ Prevention of viral hemorrhagic fever
・ Prevention paradox
・ Prevention Point Philadelphia
・ Prevention Project Dunkelfeld
・ Prevention science
・ Prevention through design
・ Preventive action
・ Preventive analgesia
・ Preventive detention
・ Preventive diplomacy
・ Preventive fraction
・ Preventive healthcare
・ Preventive journalism


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 : ウィキペディア英語版
Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002


The Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) was an Act passed by the Parliament of India in 2002, with the objective of strengthening anti-terrorism operations. The Act was enacted due to several terrorist attacks that were being carried out in India and especially in response to the attack on the Parliament. The Act replaced the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO) of 2001 and the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) (1985–95), and was supported by the governing National Democratic Alliance. The Act was repealed in 2004 by the United Progressive Alliance coalition.
The bill was defeated in the Rajya Sabha (the upper house) by a 113-98 vote, but was passed in a joint session (425 Ayes and 296 Nos), as the Lok Sabha (lower house) has more seats. It was only the third time that a bill was passed by a joint session of both houses of Parliament.
The Act defined what constituted a "terrorist act" and who a "terrorist" was, and granted special powers to the investigating authorities described under the Act. In order to ensure that discretionary powers granted to the investigating agencies were not misused and human rights violations were not committed, specific safeguards were built into the Act.〔Press Information Bureau (Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 ) Retrieved on June 30, 2008〕
==Provisions similar to TADA==
Analogous to the provisions contained in TADA, the law provided that a suspect could be detained for up to 180 days without the filing of chargesheet in court. It also allowed law enforcement agencies to withhold the identities of witnesses, and to treat confessions made to the police admissible in evidence. Under the provisions of criminal law in India, a person could deny such confessions, in court, but not under POTA.〔Rediff.com (Its goodbye to POTA ) Retrieved on July 10, 2007〕 However the law did have some safeguards. Any decision on bail petitions or the verdict of the special courts constituted under this Act could be appealed from, to a division bench of the High Court having jurisdiction. Also unlike TADA, it had no provision to allow preventive detention.〔http://www.bc.edu/dam/files/schools/law/lawreviews/journals/bctwj/25_1/09_FMS.htm〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.